I had read reports on SummerSlam and have been able to watch some of the 2005 edition. Watching Kurt Angle destroy Eugene to the delight of the crowd was fun; however, Angle is the heel in the feud and Eugene is the babyface. That got me thinking.
I’ve watched WWE wrestling for a while now and I’ve noticed that there are two different kinds of fans that show up. There’s the TV crowd and the PPV crowd. The TV crowd, for the most part, follows the storylines with the fans supporting the faces, and booing the heels.
The PPV crowd is a different animal. The crowd will support whoever they feel like. The respect level increases. Fans will cheer good wrestling by a face or heel. Fans will cheer effort. Fans will boo The Rock when they all knew he was leaving. Fans will cheer Kurt Angle because he is a phenomenal worker. Storyline heels and faces are not absolute during the PPV’s.
Should the WWE be trying to please the PPV or TV Crowd? If the fans are going to cheer Angle, should the WWE just acknowledge it? If the fans have turned on Eugene, should the WWE go with it? The WWE may be testing the waters with the Hardy-Edge-Lita storyline. With that, the WWE took a shoot and said “to hell with the storyline and Kane” let’s go with the real life feud.
If the WWE goes ahead and tries to please the PPV crowd all the time, I wonder if a new PPV crowd will emerge.